Measurement of particulate matter 2.5 in surgical smoke and its health hazards.

PURPOSE: Surgical smoke is generated during the cauterization, coagulation, and incision of biological tissues by electrocautery, ultrasonic coagulation, incising devices, and lasers. Surgical smoke comprises water, water vapor, steam, and some particulate matter, including bacteria, viruses, cell fragments, and volatile organic compounds, which can pose health risks to the operating room personnel. In this study, we measured the concentration of particulate matter 2.5 (particles with a diameter of ≤ 2.5 µm) in surgical smoke. METHODS: We used digital dust counters for real-time monitoring of particulate matter 2.5 generated intraoperatively in breast and gastrointestinal surgeries performed at our hospitals between 2019 and 2020. RESULTS: Concentrations of particulate matter 2.5 were measured in surgical smoke generated when performing 14 different surgeries. Immediately after electrocautery, the concentration of particulate matter 2.5 increased to 2258 µg/m3 and then, when we stopped using the devices, it decreased rapidly to the initial levels. Interestingly, the concentrations increased after each intermittent electrocautery procedure. Higher concentrations of particulate matter 2.5 were observed during breast surgeries than during laparoscopic procedures. CONCLUSION: Surgical smoke poses potential health risks to operating room personnel by contaminating their breathing zone with high concentrations of particulate matter 2.5. A local exhaust ventilation system is needed to reduce exposure.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on asthma treatment in Japan: Perspectives based on doctors' views.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a great influence on medical practice in Japan. In this study, an online questionnaire-based survey was conducted among doctors routinely involved in the treatment of asthma. The questions included in the survey pertained to their thoughts on asthma treatment amidst COVID-19, changes in their clinical approach toward patients with asthma, and the behavioral changes in patients in the pandemic era. The results revealed a significant impact of the pandemic on asthma treatment. Regardless of whether or not they were directly involved in the treatment of patients with COVID-19, the doctors had avoided using nebulizers in outpatient wards/clinics and routine pulmonary function testing. An increase in canceled appointments and inappropriate/non-adherence to treatment among their patients were noticeable. Furthermore, the survey revealed an extensive impact of the pandemic on the doctors engaged in asthma treatment irrespective of the differences in their medical backgrounds.

Pneumonia Caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 and Influenza Virus: A Multicenter Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Detailed differences in clinical information between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia (CP), which is the main phenotype of SARS-CoV-2 disease, and influenza pneumonia (IP) are still unclear. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted by including patients with CP who were hospitalized between January and June 2020 and a retrospective cohort of patients with IP hospitalized from 2009 to 2020. We compared the clinical presentations and studied the prognostic factors of CP and IP. RESULTS: Compared with the IP group (n = 66), in the multivariate analysis, the CP group (n = 362) had a lower percentage of patients with underlying asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < .01), lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (P < .01), lower systolic blood pressure (P < .01), higher diastolic blood pressure (P < .01), lower aspartate aminotransferase level (P < .05), higher serum sodium level (P < .05), and more frequent multilobar infiltrates (P < .05). The diagnostic scoring system based on these findings showed excellent differentiation between CP and IP (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.889). Moreover, the prognostic predictors were different between CP and IP. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive differences between CP and IP were revealed, highlighting the need for early differentiation between these 2 pneumonias in clinical settings.

The prevalence of comorbid respiratory disease among COVID-19 patients, and mortality during the first wave in Japan: A nationwide survey by the Japanese Respiratory Society.

There is a concern that persons with underlying respiratory disease may have increased susceptibility to COVID-19 and/or increased severity/mortality if infected. However, information regarding such patients during the first wave of the epidemic is lacking in Japan. We surveyed chest physicians nationwide, and collected anonymous data concerning 1444 patients. Among COVID-19 patients, the prevalence of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and interstitial lung diseases (ILD) was 3.4%, 4.8%, and 1.5%, respectively. Among COVID-19 patients with these 3 comorbidities, exacerbation of the comorbidity occurred in 12.2%, 18.8%, and 36.4%, respectively, and mortality (6.2% overall) was 4.1%, 13.0%, and 31.8%, respectively. The prevalence of asthma among COVID-19 patients was not higher than that for the general population, and mortality in COVID-19 patients with asthma was not higher than mortality in COVID-19 patients without underlying respiratory disease. COVID-19 patients having COPD or ILD had relatively high mortality, especially for ILD.